The Centurion is a bit faster, can fly higher and is pretty touchy with its landfing gear. It can even lower the height of the waves and anchor the aircraft. Normally they don't look so realistic, but with the beaver they do. The author also took care with the water landings. Not necessarily the most realistic engine management, but everything feels nice and works well. From the Flight performance they aren't so different from each other.Ģ) Sorry I don't have the Beaver X, but the SMS DHC-2 is really nice. But the AirFoilLabs is still in development. All of them looks interesting and high quality.ġ) I have both the Engine Management and Sound and Effect Inhtegration of the A2A is a bit better. And which of these two Carenados would you consider to be the best one ?īuying all four would be to expensive I think but I might pick up more than one. How realistic plane will this package give us ? Can it be compared to a A2A offering ? And not in realistic virtual Beaver like the SMS one I expect.

If I take of in this plane and set max power (throttle rpm fully forward) and leave them there what is going to happen with the SMS Beaver ? In the FSX Aerosoft this is going to work fine in real life certainly not I have been told. I have the impression that it is more realistic than what I have in the Aerosoft Beaver X. How good is this compared to the A2A C172 for FSX (which I have)? What are their strong points compared to the other ? Which is best ? Here are my thoughts and questions about them As far as I know these four are the best offerings available. I intend to get my first add on plane for XP 10.

Best ga planes for x plane 11